The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (or IPCC) has recently issued a series of so-called “energy transition pathways”. Theseareessentiallyroutes我们作为一个社会需要,以prevent global warming from exceeding the limit at which society cannot continue to function. All of these pathways rely on a technology known as “carbon capture”, which would capture carbon dioxide from fossil fuel energy plants to prevent it from impacting the atmosphere. As a result, there has been a massive investment of money and resources in this technology. But, some new research from Lancaster University is attempting to figure out if that is actually the right path for society. Ben McAllister spoke to Denes Csala...
Comments
The root disagreement I have
The root disagreement I have with the Committee on Climate Change is that I do not support the unscientific fraudulent claims of "Carbon Carbon and Storage" because there can be no guarantee that any carbon dioxide gas captured and "stored" could not leak eventually.
Additionally, CCS-LEAK would provide an irresistible temptation to those contracted to store CO2 to increase their profits massively by false accounting to cover-up low-cost deliberate leaking of CO2 rather than undermine their profitability by expensive long-term storage of CO2.
CCS-LEAK is therefore an invitation to fraud and is not a practical solution to meet our climate change obligations.
My Renewable Energy Blog
* Wind, storage and back-up system designer
* Double Tidal Lagoon Baseload Scheme
* Off-Shore Electricity from Wind, Solar and Hydrogen Power
* World’s biggest-ever pumped-storage hydro-scheme, for Scotland?
* Search for sites to build new pumped-storage hydroelectricity schemes
* Glasa Morie Glass Pumped-Storage Hydro Scheme
* Let’s supersize × 1000 the tiny Glasa hydro scheme!
* Modelling of wind and pumped-storage power
* Scotland Electricity Generation – my plan for 2020
* South America – GREAT for Renewable Energy
Add a comment